The Board found that the respondent’s conviction for possession of child pornography was a particularly serious crime based on the nature and specific facts of the offense, making him ineligible for withholding of removal.
https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/tag/child-citizenshjip-protection-act/
https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/tag/child-asylum/
https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/tag/border-children/