The court found that the petitioner was not eligible for cancellation of removal because he had been subject to a “formal, documented process” sufficient to break continuous physical presence.
https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/tag/best-deportation-lawyer/
https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/tag/american-immigration-lawyers-association/
https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/tag/immigrationlawyer/